Frequently asked questions

 

You will find here answers to the most common questions on the FSC in general and the Quebec Initiative in particular. Do not hesitate to write to us if you have additional questions. We will use them to complete this page.


Index:


What is the FSC?

The Forest Stewardship Council certification program provides recognition on the marketplace to those who practice responsible forestry. Third party verification and certification under this programme ensures the validity of this recognition.

How is the FSC structured to ensure the representation of a variety of interests?

The FSC is a membership-based organisation, whose members belong to one of three categories, known as "chambers": social, environmental and economic. The Board of director's compostionsees to the equilibrium between chambers and North and south hemispheres in the membership composition.

Why become an FSC member?

Members comment and vote on FSC policies, and elect the board members.

Can a person or an organisation from abroad decide how forestry will be done in Quebec via the FSC?

No. The whole of the FSC membership decides of the organisation's policies and mandates. Furthermore, the FSC encourages the development of regional standards for responsible forestry. They must follow the FSC Principles and Criteria, but must also emerge from a participative process in which all regional forest stakeholders are represented.

What are the advantages of certifying one's forest with the FSC?

FSC certification not only ensures that forestry practices meet a certain standard of good practices, it also signals to the consume that the product's origin is a well-managed forest. If the wood will not necessarily fetch a higher price, it still finds itself in a priviledged and growing market niche.

Why go for FSC rather than another certification program?

The FSC programme is the only one recognised worldwide. For the time being, it is also the only one to require a chain of custody, which allows to trace the origins of a product carrying the FSC logo (other programs are studying the possibility of puttin in place such a system as well).

What is the difference between ISO and FSC certification?

The ISO systeme ISO is an environmental management program, that ensures that the certified organisation follows its own internal procedures and meets the objectives it gave itself. The FSC system evaluates performancesbased on a set of fixed standards, adapted to the region.

Is FSC certification accessible to woodlot owners?

Yes. A growing number of woodlot owners are having their forests certified. Group certification, via a forest group (groupement forestier or société sylvicole) or a forest manager allows to cut costs related to the audit and certification. In Ontario, the Great Lakes/St.Lawrence standards consider the differences between large tenured land or public land and small woodlots, when appropriate.

How can the FSC promote first Nation rights?

In Canada, a fourth category of "stakeholders" was created, the Aboriginal Chamber (in addition to the social, economic and environmental chambers). Principle 3 of the FSC addresses First Nations' issues ("The legal and customary rights of indigenous peoples to own, use and manage their lands, territories, and resources shall be recognized and respected.") and includes the four following Criteria:

  1. Indigenous peoples shall control forest management on their lands and territories unless they delegate control with free and informed consent to other agencies.
  2. Forest management shall not threaten or diminish, either directly or indirectly, the resources or tenure rights of indigenous peoples.
  3. Sites of special cultural, ecological, economic or religious significance to indigenous peoples shall be clearly identified in cooperation with such peoples, and recognized and protected by forest managers.
  4. Indigenous peoples shall be compensated for the application of their traditional knowledge regarding the use of forest species or management systems in forest operations.  This compensation shall be formally agreed upon with their free and informed consent before forest operations commence.

Is a mutual recognition of the different certification systems coming up anytime soon?

Such a decision belong to FSC members. Besides, a company which is certified ISO 14000 is a step ahead in becoming FSC certified, for the organisation mechanisms it requires.

I heard of irregularities in the certification of Haliburton Forest in Ontario; what really happened?

Some lead to believe that the Haliburton Forest and Wildlife Reserve inc., in Ontario, was certified without the existence of an inventory of management plan, that the audit was conducted in the winter and that no regional members were on the evaluation team. The public document summarising the process and following decision demonstrate that:

  • the management plan was nearly completed, and constitutes a condition to FSC certification (one can become FSC certified with conditions, which must be met within a set timeframe otherwise the certificate is revoqued; pre-conditions must be met beforehand). It had to be completed within 6 months. The inventory was a second condition.
  • the certification audit happened in the second half of October, in absence of snow on the ground. In the northern hemisphere, October is a Fall month...
  • two of the four audit team members (Tom Clark and Robert Keen, both Canadians) contributed to the Ontario Great Lakes/St.Lawrence standards development process; there was also a committee of three local experts to review the audit.